Value Sensitive Design of Complex Product Systems
Value Sensitive Design (VSD) describes theoretically grounded approaches to design technologies. In particular, VSD provides a detailed and principled explanation of human values and addresses numerous design issues common in the field of information systems (Janssen, Wimmer, & Deljoo, 2015). The primary emphasis is on the distinctive interactions between humans and computers and the associated ethical values or perspectives. In essence, Value Sensitive Design utilizes various human approaches to innate values based on the conceptual, empirical, and technological analysis of events and facts.
Fundamentally, Value Sensitive Design (VSD) of complex product systems applies conceptual investigations to understand and articulate different application of technologies. The sensitive framework can provide a comprehensive illustration of how a working compromise can result in detailed explanations of conflicting values (Janssen, Wimmer, & Deljoo, 2015). Various interactional approaches to designing technological values and developing complex social and social-technical interactions can enhance formal understanding of various technical components. Moreover, the development of complex product systems based on abstract approaches is crucial in addressing various functional requirements.
Nevertheless, shareholders must take into serious consideration the specified individual and social values. The topic majorly relates to the storage of sensitive data in central or secured databases. The primary concern is the increased threats of cyber-attacks, among other harmful impacts. Consequently, Value Sensitive Design (VSD) aims to enhance autonomy and transparency in the application of technology in designing complex product systems (Mok & Hyysalo, 2018). Lastly, policymakers should address various individual and social values when designing explicit functional requirements.
Can strategic visualization approaches support Value Sensitive Design of Complex Product Systems? Provide explanations on proactive concepts necessary in understanding competing values.
Janssen, M., Wimmer, M. A., & Deljoo, A. (Eds.). (2015). Policy practice and digital science: Integrating complex systems, social simulation and public administration in policy research (Vol. 10). Berlin: Springer.
Mok, L., & Hyysalo, S. (2018). Designing for energy transition through Value Sensitive Design. Design Studies, 54, 162-183.
** Please go through above post and answer the discussion**
1. Can strategic visualization approaches support Value Sensitive Design of Complex Product Systems? Provide explanations on proactive concepts necessary in understanding competing values? (500 words min)
2. Reply with 50-100 words for above post
- At least 500 words
- And a reply with 50-100 words for above post
- Must be in APA Style
- Must Have 3 Peer Reviewed Works/Article
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."